1982 Chrysler E vs. 2001 Lancia Lybra
To start off, 2001 Lancia Lybra is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chrysler E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chrysler E would be higher. At 2,387 cc (5 cylinders), 2001 Lancia Lybra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Chrysler E (141 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 2001 Lancia Lybra. (139 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Chrysler E should accelerate faster than 2001 Lancia Lybra. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Lancia Lybra weights approximately 125 kg more than 1982 Chrysler E.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Lancia Lybra (305 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 77 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Chrysler E. (228 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2001 Lancia Lybra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Chrysler E.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Chrysler E | 2001 Lancia Lybra | |
| Make | Chrysler | Lancia |
| Model | E | Lybra |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2213 cc | 2387 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 141 HP | 139 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 228 Nm | 305 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 1800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1245 kg | 1370 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4470 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1750 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2600 mm |
