1982 Chrysler E vs. 2001 Lancia Lybra
To start off, 2001 Lancia Lybra is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chrysler E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chrysler E would be higher. At 2,555 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Chrysler E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Lancia Lybra (102 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 1982 Chrysler E. (93 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Lancia Lybra should accelerate faster than 1982 Chrysler E. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Lancia Lybra weights approximately 84 kg more than 1982 Chrysler E. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Chrysler E (179 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 35 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Lancia Lybra. (144 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1982 Chrysler E will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Lancia Lybra.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Chrysler E | 2001 Lancia Lybra | |
Make | Chrysler | Lancia |
Model | E | Lybra |
Year Released | 1982 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2555 cc | 1581 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 102 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 144 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1206 kg | 1290 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4470 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2600 mm |