1982 Chrysler E vs. 2001 MG ZT
To start off, 2001 MG ZT is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chrysler E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chrysler E would be higher. At 2,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 MG ZT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 MG ZT (187 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 46 more horse power than 1982 Chrysler E. (141 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 MG ZT should accelerate faster than 1982 Chrysler E. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 MG ZT weights approximately 330 kg more than 1982 Chrysler E. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 MG ZT (245 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 17 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Chrysler E. (228 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2001 MG ZT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Chrysler E.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Chrysler E | 2001 MG ZT | |
Make | Chrysler | MG |
Model | E | ZT |
Year Released | 1982 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2213 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 141 HP | 187 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 228 Nm | 245 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1245 kg | 1575 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2760 mm |