1982 Chrysler E vs. 2001 Opel Frogster
To start off, 2001 Opel Frogster is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chrysler E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chrysler E would be higher. At 2,555 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Chrysler E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Chrysler E (93 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 36 more horse power than 2001 Opel Frogster. (57 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Chrysler E should accelerate faster than 2001 Opel Frogster. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Opel Frogster weights approximately 92 kg more than 1982 Chrysler E.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Chrysler E (179 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 92 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Opel Frogster. (87 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 1982 Chrysler E will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Opel Frogster.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Chrysler E | 2001 Opel Frogster | |
| Make | Chrysler | Opel |
| Model | E | Frogster |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2555 cc | 973 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 93 HP | 57 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 179 Nm | 87 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1206 kg | 1298 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 3720 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1540 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2710 mm |
