1982 Chrysler E vs. 2003 Citroen C2
To start off, 2003 Citroen C2 is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chrysler E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chrysler E would be higher. At 2,555 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Chrysler E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Chrysler E (93 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 2003 Citroen C2. (67 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Chrysler E should accelerate faster than 2003 Citroen C2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Chrysler E weights approximately 162 kg more than 2003 Citroen C2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Chrysler E (179 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 29 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Citroen C2. (150 Nm @ 1750 RPM). This means 1982 Chrysler E will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Citroen C2.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Chrysler E | 2003 Citroen C2 | |
Make | Chrysler | Citroen |
Model | E | C2 |
Year Released | 1982 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2555 cc | 1360 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 67 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 150 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 1750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1206 kg | 1044 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 3670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2320 mm |