1982 Chrysler E vs. 2003 Isuzu Ascender
To start off, 2003 Isuzu Ascender is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chrysler E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chrysler E would be higher. At 5,300 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Isuzu Ascender is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Isuzu Ascender (282 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 141 more horse power than 1982 Chrysler E. (141 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Isuzu Ascender should accelerate faster than 1982 Chrysler E.
Because 2003 Isuzu Ascender is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Chrysler E. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Isuzu Ascender will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Isuzu Ascender (441 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 213 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Chrysler E. (228 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2003 Isuzu Ascender will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Chrysler E.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Chrysler E | 2003 Isuzu Ascender | |
| Make | Chrysler | Isuzu |
| Model | E | Ascender |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2213 cc | 5300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 141 HP | 282 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 228 Nm | 441 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 5280 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1940 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1920 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 3280 mm |
