1982 Chrysler E vs. 2003 Lada Calina 1118
To start off, 2003 Lada Calina 1118 is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chrysler E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chrysler E would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Lada Calina 1118 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Chrysler E weights approximately 126 kg more than 2003 Lada Calina 1118.
Because 2003 Lada Calina 1118 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Lada Calina 1118. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Chrysler E, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Chrysler E | 2003 Lada Calina 1118 | |
| Make | Chrysler | Lada |
| Model | E | Calina 1118 |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2555 cc | 6750 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 93 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1206 kg | 1080 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4050 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2480 mm |
