1982 Chrysler E vs. 2003 Lada Niva
To start off, 2003 Lada Niva is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chrysler E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chrysler E would be higher. At 2,555 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Chrysler E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Chrysler E (93 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 2003 Lada Niva. (79 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Chrysler E should accelerate faster than 2003 Lada Niva. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Lada Niva weights approximately 4 kg more than 1982 Chrysler E.
Because 2003 Lada Niva is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Chrysler E. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Lada Niva will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Chrysler E (179 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 46 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Lada Niva. (133 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1982 Chrysler E will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Lada Niva.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Chrysler E | 2003 Lada Niva | |
Make | Chrysler | Lada |
Model | E | Niva |
Year Released | 1982 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2555 cc | 1688 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 79 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 133 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1206 kg | 1210 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 3730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2210 mm |