1982 Chrysler E vs. 2003 Mazda 6
To start off, 2003 Mazda 6 is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chrysler E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chrysler E would be higher. At 2,261 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Mazda 6 (164 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 1982 Chrysler E. (141 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1982 Chrysler E. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mazda 6 weights approximately 185 kg more than 1982 Chrysler E. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Chrysler E (228 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Mazda 6. (208 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1982 Chrysler E will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Mazda 6.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Chrysler E | 2003 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Chrysler | Mazda |
Model | E | 6 |
Year Released | 1982 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2213 cc | 2261 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 141 HP | 164 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 228 Nm | 208 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1245 kg | 1430 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2680 mm |