1982 Chrysler E vs. 2003 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2003 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chrysler E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chrysler E would be higher. At 2,213 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Chrysler E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Nissan X-Trail (143 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 1982 Chrysler E. (141 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 1982 Chrysler E. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Nissan X-Trail weights approximately 40 kg more than 1982 Chrysler E. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1982 Chrysler E (228 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 36 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Nissan X-Trail. (192 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1982 Chrysler E will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Nissan X-Trail.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Chrysler E | 2003 Nissan X-Trail | |
Make | Chrysler | Nissan |
Model | E | X-Trail |
Year Released | 1982 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2213 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 141 HP | 143 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 228 Nm | 192 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Vehicle Weight | 1245 kg | 1285 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2540 mm |