1982 Chrysler E vs. 2003 Renault Clio
To start off, 2003 Renault Clio is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chrysler E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chrysler E would be higher. At 2,555 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Chrysler E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Renault Clio (177 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 84 more horse power than 1982 Chrysler E. (93 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1982 Chrysler E. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Chrysler E weights approximately 101 kg more than 2003 Renault Clio.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Renault Clio (191 Nm @ 5250 RPM) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Chrysler E. (179 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2003 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Chrysler E.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Chrysler E | 2003 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Chrysler | Renault |
| Model | E | Clio |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2555 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 93 HP | 177 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 179 Nm | 191 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1206 kg | 1105 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 3820 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2490 mm |
