1982 Chrysler E vs. 2003 Saturn L
To start off, 2003 Saturn L is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chrysler E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chrysler E would be higher. At 2,213 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Chrysler E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Chrysler E (141 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 2003 Saturn L. (135 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Chrysler E should accelerate faster than 2003 Saturn L. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Saturn L weights approximately 75 kg more than 1982 Chrysler E.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Chrysler E (228 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 29 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Saturn L. (199 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 1982 Chrysler E will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Saturn L.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Chrysler E | 2003 Saturn L | |
| Make | Chrysler | Saturn |
| Model | E | L |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2213 cc | 2196 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 141 HP | 135 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Torque | 228 Nm | 199 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1245 kg | 1320 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4840 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2710 mm |
