1982 Chrysler E vs. 2003 Subaru Outback

To start off, 2003 Subaru Outback is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chrysler E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chrysler E would be higher. At 2,555 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Chrysler E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Subaru Outback (165 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 72 more horse power than 1982 Chrysler E. (93 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Subaru Outback should accelerate faster than 1982 Chrysler E. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Subaru Outback weights approximately 239 kg more than 1982 Chrysler E. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2003 Subaru Outback is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Chrysler E. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Subaru Outback will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Subaru Outback (225 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 46 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Chrysler E. (179 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2003 Subaru Outback will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Chrysler E.

Compare all specifications:

1982 Chrysler E 2003 Subaru Outback
Make Chrysler Subaru
Model E Outback
Year Released 1982 2003
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2555 cc 2457 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line boxer
Horse Power 93 HP 165 HP
Engine RPM 4500 RPM 5600 RPM
Torque 179 Nm 225 Nm
Torque RPM 2500 RPM 4400 RPM
Drive Type Front 4WD
Vehicle Weight 1206 kg 1445 kg
Vehicle Length 4720 mm 4740 mm
Vehicle Width 1740 mm 1780 mm
Vehicle Height 1350 mm 1550 mm
Wheelbase Size 2630 mm 2530 mm