1982 Chrysler E vs. 2003 Volvo C70
To start off, 2003 Volvo C70 is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chrysler E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chrysler E would be higher. At 2,555 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Chrysler E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Volvo C70 (160 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 67 more horse power than 1982 Chrysler E. (93 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Volvo C70 should accelerate faster than 1982 Chrysler E. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Volvo C70 weights approximately 194 kg more than 1982 Chrysler E. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Volvo C70 (230 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 51 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Chrysler E. (179 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2003 Volvo C70 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Chrysler E.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Chrysler E | 2003 Volvo C70 | |
Make | Chrysler | Volvo |
Model | E | C70 |
Year Released | 1982 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2555 cc | 1984 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 160 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5100 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 230 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 1800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1206 kg | 1400 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2670 mm |