1982 Chrysler E vs. 2004 Daewoo Rezzo
To start off, 2004 Daewoo Rezzo is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chrysler E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chrysler E would be higher. At 2,555 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Chrysler E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Daewoo Rezzo (105 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 1982 Chrysler E. (93 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Daewoo Rezzo should accelerate faster than 1982 Chrysler E. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Daewoo Rezzo weights approximately 64 kg more than 1982 Chrysler E. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Chrysler E (179 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 34 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Daewoo Rezzo. (145 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 1982 Chrysler E will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Daewoo Rezzo.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Chrysler E | 2004 Daewoo Rezzo | |
Make | Chrysler | Daewoo |
Model | E | Rezzo |
Year Released | 1982 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2555 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 105 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1206 kg | 1270 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1590 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2610 mm |