1982 Chrysler E vs. 2004 Ford Escape
To start off, 2004 Ford Escape is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chrysler E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chrysler E would be higher. At 2,967 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford Escape is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Escape (210 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 69 more horse power than 1982 Chrysler E. (141 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Escape should accelerate faster than 1982 Chrysler E. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Escape weights approximately 273 kg more than 1982 Chrysler E. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Escape (271 Nm) has 43 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Chrysler E. (228 Nm). This means 2004 Ford Escape will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Chrysler E.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Chrysler E | 2004 Ford Escape | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | E | Escape |
Year Released | 1982 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2213 cc | 2967 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 141 HP | 210 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6150 RPM |
Torque | 228 Nm | 271 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1245 kg | 1518 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2630 mm |