1982 Chrysler E vs. 2004 Land Rover Discovery
To start off, 2004 Land Rover Discovery is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chrysler E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chrysler E would be higher. At 4,556 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Land Rover Discovery is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Land Rover Discovery (217 HP) has 124 more horse power than 1982 Chrysler E. (93 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Land Rover Discovery should accelerate faster than 1982 Chrysler E.
Because 2004 Land Rover Discovery is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Chrysler E. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Land Rover Discovery will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Land Rover Discovery (407 Nm) has 228 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Chrysler E. (179 Nm). This means 2004 Land Rover Discovery will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Chrysler E.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Chrysler E | 2004 Land Rover Discovery | |
| Make | Chrysler | Land Rover |
| Model | E | Discovery |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2555 cc | 4556 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 93 HP | 217 HP |
| Torque | 179 Nm | 407 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4710 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1900 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1950 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2550 mm |
