1982 Chrysler E vs. 2004 Mercury Sable
To start off, 2004 Mercury Sable is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chrysler E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chrysler E would be higher. At 2,983 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Mercury Sable is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mercury Sable (155 HP) has 62 more horse power than 1982 Chrysler E. (93 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mercury Sable should accelerate faster than 1982 Chrysler E. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mercury Sable weights approximately 307 kg more than 1982 Chrysler E. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mercury Sable (251 Nm) has 72 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Chrysler E. (179 Nm). This means 2004 Mercury Sable will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Chrysler E.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Chrysler E | 2004 Mercury Sable | |
Make | Chrysler | Mercury |
Model | E | Sable |
Year Released | 1982 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2555 cc | 2983 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 155 HP |
Torque | 179 Nm | 251 Nm |
Vehicle Weight | 1206 kg | 1513 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 5080 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2760 mm |