1982 Chrysler E vs. 2004 Saab 03-Sep
To start off, 2004 Saab 03-Sep is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chrysler E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chrysler E would be higher. At 2,213 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Chrysler E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Saab 03-Sep (176 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 1982 Chrysler E. (141 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Saab 03-Sep should accelerate faster than 1982 Chrysler E. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Saab 03-Sep weights approximately 195 kg more than 1982 Chrysler E. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Saab 03-Sep (264 Nm) has 36 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Chrysler E. (228 Nm). This means 2004 Saab 03-Sep will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Chrysler E.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Chrysler E | 2004 Saab 03-Sep | |
| Make | Chrysler | Saab |
| Model | E | 03-Sep |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2213 cc | 1983 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 141 HP | 176 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 228 Nm | 264 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1245 kg | 1440 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4640 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2680 mm |
