1982 Chrysler E vs. 2004 Samsung SM3
To start off, 2004 Samsung SM3 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chrysler E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chrysler E would be higher. At 2,555 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Chrysler E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Samsung SM3 (94 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 1982 Chrysler E. (93 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Samsung SM3 should accelerate faster than 1982 Chrysler E. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Chrysler E weights approximately 46 kg more than 2004 Samsung SM3.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Chrysler E (179 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 44 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Samsung SM3. (135 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 1982 Chrysler E will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Samsung SM3.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Chrysler E | 2004 Samsung SM3 | |
Make | Chrysler | Samsung |
Model | E | SM3 |
Year Released | 1982 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2555 cc | 1497 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 94 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 135 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1206 kg | 1160 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2540 mm |