1982 Chrysler E vs. 2004 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2004 Volvo XC90 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chrysler E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chrysler E would be higher. At 2,901 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Volvo XC90 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Volvo XC90 (268 HP) has 175 more horse power than 1982 Chrysler E. (93 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Volvo XC90 should accelerate faster than 1982 Chrysler E. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Volvo XC90 weights approximately 900 kg more than 1982 Chrysler E. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Volvo XC90 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Chrysler E. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Volvo XC90 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Volvo XC90 (380 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 201 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Chrysler E. (179 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2004 Volvo XC90 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Chrysler E.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Chrysler E | 2004 Volvo XC90 | |
Make | Chrysler | Volvo |
Model | E | XC90 |
Year Released | 1982 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2555 cc | 2901 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 268 HP |
Torque | 179 Nm | 380 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 1800 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1206 kg | 2106 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2870 mm |