1982 Chrysler E vs. 2005 Mazda MX-Flexa
To start off, 2005 Mazda MX-Flexa is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chrysler E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chrysler E would be higher. At 2,555 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Chrysler E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mazda MX-Flexa (158 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 65 more horse power than 1982 Chrysler E. (93 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mazda MX-Flexa should accelerate faster than 1982 Chrysler E.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mazda MX-Flexa (207 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 28 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Chrysler E. (179 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2005 Mazda MX-Flexa will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Chrysler E.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Chrysler E | 2005 Mazda MX-Flexa | |
| Make | Chrysler | Mazda |
| Model | E | MX-Flexa |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2555 cc | 2261 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 93 HP | 158 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 179 Nm | 207 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4480 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1750 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1660 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2760 mm |
