1982 Chrysler E vs. 2005 Mercedes-Benz ML
To start off, 2005 Mercedes-Benz ML is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chrysler E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chrysler E would be higher. At 3,724 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Mercedes-Benz ML is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mercedes-Benz ML (231 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 138 more horse power than 1982 Chrysler E. (93 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mercedes-Benz ML should accelerate faster than 1982 Chrysler E. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mercedes-Benz ML weights approximately 914 kg more than 1982 Chrysler E. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Mercedes-Benz ML is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Chrysler E. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mercedes-Benz ML will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mercedes-Benz ML (330 Nm) has 151 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Chrysler E. (179 Nm). This means 2005 Mercedes-Benz ML will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Chrysler E.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Chrysler E | 2005 Mercedes-Benz ML | |
| Make | Chrysler | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | E | ML |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2555 cc | 3724 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 93 HP | 231 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Torque | 179 Nm | 330 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1206 kg | 2120 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2720 mm |
