1982 Chrysler E vs. 2005 Nissan Hardbody
To start off, 2005 Nissan Hardbody is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chrysler E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chrysler E would be higher. At 2,663 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Nissan Hardbody is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Nissan Hardbody (155 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 1982 Chrysler E. (141 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Nissan Hardbody should accelerate faster than 1982 Chrysler E. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Nissan Hardbody weights approximately 250 kg more than 1982 Chrysler E. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1982 Chrysler E (228 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 19 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Nissan Hardbody. (209 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1982 Chrysler E will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Nissan Hardbody.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Chrysler E | 2005 Nissan Hardbody | |
| Make | Chrysler | Nissan |
| Model | E | Hardbody |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2213 cc | 2663 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 141 HP | 155 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Torque | 228 Nm | 209 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Vehicle Weight | 1245 kg | 1495 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2690 mm |
