1982 Chrysler E vs. 2005 Rover 45
To start off, 2005 Rover 45 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chrysler E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chrysler E would be higher. At 2,213 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Chrysler E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Chrysler E (141 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 2005 Rover 45. (99 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Chrysler E should accelerate faster than 2005 Rover 45. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Chrysler E weights approximately 15 kg more than 2005 Rover 45. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Rover 45 (240 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Chrysler E. (228 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2005 Rover 45 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Chrysler E.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Chrysler E | 2005 Rover 45 | |
Make | Chrysler | Rover |
Model | E | 45 |
Year Released | 1982 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2213 cc | 1993 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 141 HP | 99 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 228 Nm | 240 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1245 kg | 1230 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2630 mm |