1982 Chrysler E vs. 2005 Suzuki XL7
To start off, 2005 Suzuki XL7 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chrysler E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chrysler E would be higher. At 2,737 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Suzuki XL7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Suzuki XL7 (185 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 92 more horse power than 1982 Chrysler E. (93 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Suzuki XL7 should accelerate faster than 1982 Chrysler E. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Suzuki XL7 weights approximately 519 kg more than 1982 Chrysler E. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Suzuki XL7 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Chrysler E. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Suzuki XL7 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Suzuki XL7 (250 Nm) has 71 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Chrysler E. (179 Nm). This means 2005 Suzuki XL7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Chrysler E.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Chrysler E | 2005 Suzuki XL7 | |
Make | Chrysler | Suzuki |
Model | E | XL7 |
Year Released | 1982 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2555 cc | 2737 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 185 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 250 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1206 kg | 1725 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2810 mm |