1982 Chrysler E vs. 2005 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2005 Toyota Matrix is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chrysler E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chrysler E would be higher. At 2,213 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Chrysler E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Chrysler E (141 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 2005 Toyota Matrix. (130 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Chrysler E should accelerate faster than 2005 Toyota Matrix. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Chrysler E weights approximately 20 kg more than 2005 Toyota Matrix. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Chrysler E (228 Nm) has 58 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Toyota Matrix. (170 Nm). This means 1982 Chrysler E will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Toyota Matrix.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Chrysler E | 2005 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | Chrysler | Toyota |
Model | E | Matrix |
Year Released | 1982 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2213 cc | 1786 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 141 HP | 130 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 228 Nm | 170 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1245 kg | 1225 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2500 mm |