1982 Chrysler E vs. 2005 Toyota MR2
To start off, 2005 Toyota MR2 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chrysler E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chrysler E would be higher. At 2,555 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Chrysler E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Toyota MR2 (138 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 1982 Chrysler E. (93 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Toyota MR2 should accelerate faster than 1982 Chrysler E. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Chrysler E weights approximately 210 kg more than 2005 Toyota MR2.
Because 2005 Toyota MR2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Toyota MR2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Chrysler E, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Chrysler E (179 Nm) has 9 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Toyota MR2. (170 Nm). This means 1982 Chrysler E will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Toyota MR2.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Chrysler E | 2005 Toyota MR2 | |
Make | Chrysler | Toyota |
Model | E | MR2 |
Year Released | 1982 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2555 cc | 1802 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 138 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 170 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1206 kg | 996 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 3890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1250 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2500 mm |