1982 Chrysler E vs. 2006 Ford E-250
To start off, 2006 Ford E-250 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chrysler E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chrysler E would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Ford E-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford E-250 (225 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 132 more horse power than 1982 Chrysler E. (93 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford E-250 should accelerate faster than 1982 Chrysler E. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford E-250 weights approximately 18 kg more than 1982 Chrysler E. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford E-250 (388 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 209 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Chrysler E. (179 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2006 Ford E-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Chrysler E.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Chrysler E | 2006 Ford E-250 | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | E | E-250 |
Year Released | 1982 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2555 cc | 4605 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 225 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 388 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1206 kg | 1224 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 2120 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 3510 mm |