1982 Chrysler E vs. 2006 Rover 75
To start off, 2006 Rover 75 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chrysler E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chrysler E would be higher. At 2,555 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Chrysler E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Rover 75 (158 HP) has 65 more horse power than 1982 Chrysler E. (93 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Rover 75 should accelerate faster than 1982 Chrysler E. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Rover 75 weights approximately 244 kg more than 1982 Chrysler E. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Rover 75 (215 Nm @ 2100 RPM) has 36 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Chrysler E. (179 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2006 Rover 75 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Chrysler E.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Chrysler E | 2006 Rover 75 | |
| Make | Chrysler | Rover |
| Model | E | 75 |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2555 cc | 1796 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 93 HP | 158 HP |
| Torque | 179 Nm | 215 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 2100 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1206 kg | 1450 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4800 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2750 mm |
