1982 Chrysler E vs. 2006 Volvo V50
To start off, 2006 Volvo V50 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chrysler E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chrysler E would be higher. At 2,555 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Chrysler E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Volvo V50 (168 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 75 more horse power than 1982 Chrysler E. (93 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Volvo V50 should accelerate faster than 1982 Chrysler E. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Volvo V50 weights approximately 219 kg more than 1982 Chrysler E. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Volvo V50 (231 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 52 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Chrysler E. (179 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2006 Volvo V50 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Chrysler E.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Chrysler E | 2006 Volvo V50 | |
Make | Chrysler | Volvo |
Model | E | V50 |
Year Released | 1982 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2555 cc | 2442 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 168 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 231 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1206 kg | 1425 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2650 mm |