1982 Chrysler E vs. 2007 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2007 Ford Ranger is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chrysler E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chrysler E would be higher. At 2,399 cc (4 cylinders), 2007 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Ford Ranger (143 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 1982 Chrysler E. (141 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1982 Chrysler E.
Because 2007 Ford Ranger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2007 Ford Ranger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Chrysler E, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Chrysler E (228 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 19 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Ford Ranger. (209 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 1982 Chrysler E will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Ford Ranger.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Chrysler E | 2007 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | E | Ranger |
Year Released | 1982 | 2007 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2213 cc | 2399 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 141 HP | 143 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 228 Nm | 209 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2840 mm |