1982 Chrysler E vs. 2007 Mazda CX-9
To start off, 2007 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chrysler E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chrysler E would be higher. At 3,500 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Mazda CX-9 (250 HP) has 109 more horse power than 1982 Chrysler E. (141 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1982 Chrysler E.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Mazda CX-9 (325 Nm) has 97 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Chrysler E. (228 Nm). This means 2007 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Chrysler E.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Chrysler E | 2007 Mazda CX-9 | |
| Make | Chrysler | Mazda |
| Model | E | CX-9 |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2007 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2213 cc | 3500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 141 HP | 250 HP |
| Torque | 228 Nm | 325 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 5080 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1940 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1740 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2880 mm |
