1982 Chrysler E vs. 2008 Ford Falcon

To start off, 2008 Ford Falcon is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chrysler E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chrysler E would be higher. At 3,983 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Ford Falcon (362 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 221 more horse power than 1982 Chrysler E. (141 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1982 Chrysler E. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Ford Falcon weights approximately 459 kg more than 1982 Chrysler E. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2008 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2008 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Chrysler E, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Ford Falcon (533 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 305 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Chrysler E. (228 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2008 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Chrysler E.

Compare all specifications: