1982 Chrysler E vs. 2008 Holden Caprice
To start off, 2008 Holden Caprice is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chrysler E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chrysler E would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Holden Caprice is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Holden Caprice (278 HP) has 185 more horse power than 1982 Chrysler E. (93 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Holden Caprice should accelerate faster than 1982 Chrysler E.
Because 2008 Holden Caprice is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2008 Holden Caprice. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Chrysler E, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Holden Caprice (350 Nm) has 171 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Chrysler E. (179 Nm). This means 2008 Holden Caprice will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Chrysler E.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Chrysler E | 2008 Holden Caprice | |
Make | Chrysler | Holden |
Model | E | Caprice |
Year Released | 1982 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2555 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 278 HP |
Torque | 179 Nm | 350 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |