1982 Chrysler E vs. 2008 Jeep Compass
To start off, 2008 Jeep Compass is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chrysler E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chrysler E would be higher. At 2,213 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Chrysler E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Chrysler E (141 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 2008 Jeep Compass. (138 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Chrysler E should accelerate faster than 2008 Jeep Compass. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Compass weights approximately 365 kg more than 1982 Chrysler E.
Because 2008 Jeep Compass is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Chrysler E. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Compass will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Jeep Compass (310 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 82 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Chrysler E. (228 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2008 Jeep Compass will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Chrysler E.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Chrysler E | 2008 Jeep Compass | |
Make | Chrysler | Jeep |
Model | E | Compass |
Year Released | 1982 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2213 cc | 1968 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 141 HP | 138 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 228 Nm | 310 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 1750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1245 kg | 1610 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1640 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2640 mm |