1982 Chrysler E vs. 2009 Acura CSX
To start off, 2009 Acura CSX is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chrysler E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chrysler E would be higher. At 2,213 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Chrysler E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Acura CSX (197 HP) has 56 more horse power than 1982 Chrysler E. (141 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Acura CSX should accelerate faster than 1982 Chrysler E. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Acura CSX weights approximately 68 kg more than 1982 Chrysler E. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Chrysler E | 2009 Acura CSX | |
Make | Chrysler | Acura |
Model | E | CSX |
Year Released | 1982 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2213 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 141 HP | 197 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1245 kg | 1313 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4544 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1752 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1435 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2700 mm |