1982 Chrysler E vs. 2009 Daewoo Rezzo
To start off, 2009 Daewoo Rezzo is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chrysler E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chrysler E would be higher. At 2,213 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Chrysler E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Chrysler E (141 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 38 more horse power than 2009 Daewoo Rezzo. (103 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Chrysler E should accelerate faster than 2009 Daewoo Rezzo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Daewoo Rezzo weights approximately 102 kg more than 1982 Chrysler E.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Chrysler E (228 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 86 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Daewoo Rezzo. (142 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 1982 Chrysler E will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Daewoo Rezzo.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Chrysler E | 2009 Daewoo Rezzo | |
Make | Chrysler | Daewoo |
Model | E | Rezzo |
Year Released | 1982 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2213 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 141 HP | 103 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 228 Nm | 142 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1245 kg | 1347 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1590 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2610 mm |