1982 Chrysler E vs. 2009 Ford Flex
To start off, 2009 Ford Flex is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chrysler E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chrysler E would be higher. At 3,496 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Ford Flex is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Flex (262 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 121 more horse power than 1982 Chrysler E. (141 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Flex should accelerate faster than 1982 Chrysler E. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Chrysler E weights approximately 279 kg more than 2009 Ford Flex.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Ford Flex (336 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 108 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Chrysler E. (228 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2009 Ford Flex will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Chrysler E.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Chrysler E | 2009 Ford Flex | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | E | Flex |
Year Released | 1982 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2213 cc | 3496 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 141 HP | 262 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 228 Nm | 336 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1245 kg | 966 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 5130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1930 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1730 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 3000 mm |