1982 Chrysler E vs. 2009 Holden Epica
To start off, 2009 Holden Epica is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chrysler E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chrysler E would be higher. At 2,555 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Chrysler E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Holden Epica (153 HP) has 60 more horse power than 1982 Chrysler E. (93 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 1982 Chrysler E.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Holden Epica (237 Nm) has 58 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Chrysler E. (179 Nm). This means 2009 Holden Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Chrysler E.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Chrysler E | 2009 Holden Epica | |
Make | Chrysler | Holden |
Model | E | Epica |
Year Released | 1982 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2555 cc | 2492 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 153 HP |
Torque | 179 Nm | 237 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2700 mm |