1982 Chrysler E vs. 2009 Jaguar XJ
To start off, 2009 Jaguar XJ is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chrysler E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chrysler E would be higher. At 4,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Jaguar XJ (297 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 204 more horse power than 1982 Chrysler E. (93 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 1982 Chrysler E.
Because 2009 Jaguar XJ is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Jaguar XJ. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Chrysler E, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Jaguar XJ (310 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 131 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Chrysler E. (179 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2009 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Chrysler E.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Chrysler E | 2009 Jaguar XJ | |
Make | Chrysler | Jaguar |
Model | E | XJ |
Year Released | 1982 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2555 cc | 4200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 297 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 310 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4100 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4970 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1950 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 3040 mm |