1982 Chrysler E vs. 2009 Mazda 3
To start off, 2009 Mazda 3 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chrysler E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chrysler E would be higher. At 2,555 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Chrysler E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 3 (104 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 1982 Chrysler E. (93 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1982 Chrysler E. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Chrysler E weights approximately 14 kg more than 2009 Mazda 3.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Chrysler E (179 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 34 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda 3. (145 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1982 Chrysler E will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda 3.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Chrysler E | 2009 Mazda 3 | |
| Make | Chrysler | Mazda |
| Model | E | 3 |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2555 cc | 1598 cc |
| Horse Power | 93 HP | 104 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 179 Nm | 145 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1206 kg | 1192 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4430 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2650 mm |
