1982 Chrysler E vs. 2009 Nissan NP300
To start off, 2009 Nissan NP300 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chrysler E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chrysler E would be higher. At 2,486 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Nissan NP300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Chrysler E (141 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 2009 Nissan NP300. (131 HP @ 3500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Chrysler E should accelerate faster than 2009 Nissan NP300.
Because 2009 Nissan NP300 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Chrysler E. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Nissan NP300 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Nissan NP300 (304 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 76 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Chrysler E. (228 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2009 Nissan NP300 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Chrysler E.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Chrysler E | 2009 Nissan NP300 | |
| Make | Chrysler | Nissan |
| Model | E | NP300 |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2213 cc | 2486 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 141 HP | 131 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Torque | 228 Nm | 304 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 5180 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1630 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2960 mm |
