1982 Chrysler E vs. 2009 Pontiac Solstice

To start off, 2009 Pontiac Solstice is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chrysler E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chrysler E would be higher. At 2,555 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Chrysler E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Pontiac Solstice (171 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 78 more horse power than 1982 Chrysler E. (93 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Pontiac Solstice should accelerate faster than 1982 Chrysler E. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Pontiac Solstice weights approximately 126 kg more than 1982 Chrysler E. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2009 Pontiac Solstice is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Pontiac Solstice. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Chrysler E, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Chrysler E (179 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Pontiac Solstice. (167 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1982 Chrysler E will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Pontiac Solstice.

Compare all specifications: