1982 Chrysler E vs. 2010 Audi TT
To start off, 2010 Audi TT is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chrysler E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chrysler E would be higher. At 2,213 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Chrysler E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Audi TT (168 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 1982 Chrysler E. (141 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1982 Chrysler E.
Because 2010 Audi TT is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Chrysler E. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Audi TT (350 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 122 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Chrysler E. (228 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2010 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Chrysler E.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Chrysler E | 2010 Audi TT | |
Make | Chrysler | Audi |
Model | E | TT |
Year Released | 1982 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2213 cc | 1964 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 141 HP | 168 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 228 Nm | 350 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 1750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | AWD |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4201 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1842 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1359 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2469 mm |