1982 Chrysler E vs. 2010 Holden Caprice
To start off, 2010 Holden Caprice is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chrysler E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chrysler E would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Holden Caprice is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Caprice (344 HP) has 203 more horse power than 1982 Chrysler E. (141 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Caprice should accelerate faster than 1982 Chrysler E.
Because 2010 Holden Caprice is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Holden Caprice. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Chrysler E, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Caprice (530 Nm) has 302 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Chrysler E. (228 Nm). This means 2010 Holden Caprice will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Chrysler E.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Chrysler E | 2010 Holden Caprice | |
| Make | Chrysler | Holden |
| Model | E | Caprice |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2213 cc | 6000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 141 HP | 344 HP |
| Torque | 228 Nm | 530 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
