1982 Chrysler E vs. 2010 Honda Civic
To start off, 2010 Honda Civic is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chrysler E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chrysler E would be higher. At 2,555 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Chrysler E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Honda Civic (140 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 47 more horse power than 1982 Chrysler E. (93 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Honda Civic should accelerate faster than 1982 Chrysler E. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Honda Civic weights approximately 13 kg more than 1982 Chrysler E. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Chrysler E (179 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 6 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Honda Civic. (173 Nm @ 4300 RPM). This means 1982 Chrysler E will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Honda Civic.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Chrysler E | 2010 Honda Civic | |
Make | Chrysler | Honda |
Model | E | Civic |
Year Released | 1982 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2555 cc | 1800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 140 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 173 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1206 kg | 1219 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4503 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1753 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1435 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2700 mm |