1982 Chrysler E vs. 2010 Infiniti M
To start off, 2010 Infiniti M is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chrysler E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chrysler E would be higher. At 2,993 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Infiniti M is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Infiniti M (235 HP @ 3750 RPM) has 94 more horse power than 1982 Chrysler E. (141 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Infiniti M should accelerate faster than 1982 Chrysler E.
Because 2010 Infiniti M is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Infiniti M. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Chrysler E, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Infiniti M (550 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 322 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Chrysler E. (228 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2010 Infiniti M will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Chrysler E.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Chrysler E | 2010 Infiniti M | |
| Make | Chrysler | Infiniti |
| Model | E | M |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2213 cc | 2993 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 141 HP | 235 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 3750 RPM |
| Torque | 228 Nm | 550 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 1750 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4945 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1844 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1501 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2901 mm |
