1982 Chrysler E vs. 2010 Kia Cee'd
To start off, 2010 Kia Cee'd is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chrysler E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chrysler E would be higher. At 2,555 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Chrysler E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Kia Cee'd (124 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 1982 Chrysler E. (93 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Kia Cee'd should accelerate faster than 1982 Chrysler E. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Kia Cee'd weights approximately 111 kg more than 1982 Chrysler E. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Chrysler E (179 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 24 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Kia Cee'd. (155 Nm @ 5200 RPM). This means 1982 Chrysler E will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Kia Cee'd.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Chrysler E | 2010 Kia Cee'd | |
Make | Chrysler | Kia |
Model | E | Cee'd |
Year Released | 1982 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2555 cc | 1591 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 124 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 155 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1206 kg | 1317 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2660 mm |