1982 Chrysler E vs. 2010 Kia Forte
To start off, 2010 Kia Forte is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chrysler E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chrysler E would be higher. At 2,555 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Chrysler E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Kia Forte (156 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 63 more horse power than 1982 Chrysler E. (93 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Kia Forte should accelerate faster than 1982 Chrysler E. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Kia Forte weights approximately 22 kg more than 1982 Chrysler E. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Kia Forte (195 Nm @ 4300 RPM) has 16 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Chrysler E. (179 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2010 Kia Forte will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Chrysler E.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Chrysler E | 2010 Kia Forte | |
Make | Chrysler | Kia |
Model | E | Forte |
Year Released | 1982 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2555 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 156 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 195 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1206 kg | 1228 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4529 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1775 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1461 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2649 mm |